How to Critique/Review

by Rick Taubold

The purpose of a peer-review writing workshop is to help writers be the best they can be and helping them to improve their writing to the point that it's publishable. A peer-review workshop, online or in person, is not a place to show off your work to others in the hope of impressing them. It is designed so that everyone’s work has the opportunity to be reviewed by others in the workshop.

In that regard, a peer-review workshop is also a teaching environment, but it is not a classroom setting where instructors do the teaching exclusively. The participants should be there to learn from one another.

 

Critiquing is a part of learning to write well because it exposes you to techniques you may not have thought of or experienced. That said, here are suggestions on how to critique the work of others. Experiment with these, then develop a style that fits you.

REVIEW ETIQUETTE: The purpose of a critique is to help the writer improve his or her writing, not to slam the work. Destructive criticism or the deliberate trashing others' work, no matter how bad a piece is, has no place in a workshop. Likewise, since it's presumed that anyone presenting work for critique is here to learn how to make it better, a whitewash job of reviewing doesn’t help the writer. Be honest, but be courteous and positive and respect the writer's efforts.

WHAT'S EXPECTED IN A REVIEW: Learning to review well is not something that comes easily to every writer. It can take years to master, but along the way, you will find yourself learning as well. To that end, let’s approach reviewing and critiquing in two stages: one for beginners, one for more experienced folks.

FOR EVERYONE: At a bare minimum, a review should express what you thought of the piece. A review needs to be more than one word or one or two sentences saying "Good" or "I really enjoyed this story" or "I think this is good, but I think it needs to be longer." These are not acceptable reviews. As a general guide, a review should probably be at least 100 words. There's no maximum length, and I’ve seen some reviews that are actually longer than the piece being reviewed.

Use the four principles of critiquing. If you're new to critiquing, start small and keep your reviews short but as informative as possible.

1. Begin with something positive and encouraging.

2. What do you feel is working and what is strong in the piece?

3. What needs work and what parts are weak?

4. Offer suggestions for improvement if you are comfortable doing so. Otherwise, wait until you have more reviewing experience.

5. Always respect the writer’s voice and style. Never attempt to rewrite the piece according to your style or personal preferences.

FOR BEGINNERS: Focus on why you liked or didn't like the piece in terms of what worked or didn't work for you. If you think the story needs nothing more, say so, but don't stop with that. Here are three things you can focus on.

1. Did you like the piece? If so, what about it impressed you? If not, what do you think was missing or what detracted from your enjoyment? Did the opening grab your attention and did the piece hold your attention throughout? How did the piece make you feel? Does the ending work (assuming it's a complete story)? If the ending does not work for you, what do you think would make it better?

2. How is the overall writing? Is it smooth, or is it rough and in need of work? Does the story flow smoothly? If there are problems, try to give the author some idea of what you think might help.

3. What did you think of the characters and the narrator (the one telling the story)? Are they well drawn and believable?

FOR ADVANCED REVIEWERS:

All of the points mentioned for beginners apply, but you may wish to delve more deeply into the piece. Here's a more detailed list of areas to consider. The review doesn't need to cover all or even half of these. What you choose to point out is at your discretion.

1. How did the piece make you feel?

2. Did the opening hook and engage you immediately, or was it a slow beginning? Did the story begin in the right place, or should it have started sooner or later in the chain of events?

3. Did the piece flow well from point to point?

4. Were there areas of confusion?

5. Were there any places where you wanted to stop reading?

6. Did the characters resonate with you? Were their personalities (and names) appropriate for the piece? Were the characters believable in the story's setting?

7. Did anything feel out of place or incongruous to the story?

8. Did the writer engage all the senses (sight, smell, hearing, taste, touch) when appropriate?

9. Did you feel as if the writer was telling you the story, or were you experiencing (being shown) through the characters' perspectives?

10. Did it engage you emotionally? Did you laugh, cry, feel anxious for the characters, etc.?

11. Was the level of conflict (physical and emotional) appropriate for the piece?

12. Was the writing itself smooth throughout? Are there specific issues with grammar or punctuation that you want to point out? You should avoid nitpicking a piece to death, however. Remember that your purpose is to critique the piece, not edit it.

13. Was the tone (language and word choices) appropriate? For example, if the story is not set in the modern day, did the writer use words or expressions (or even character names) that felt out of place for the setting?

14. Did the story end in a way consistent with how it was set up in the beginning and written throughout, or did the ending feel forced?

15. What impressed you about this story?

From time to time, you may encounter a piece that requires significant rework in many areas. Instead of attempting to cover everything—which might discourage the author—point out a few of the major things to work on and save the smaller stuff for later when the piece is coming together better. If the writer makes significant changes, some or all of those small things may be taken care of in the process.

Finally, some authors may bring polished stories to ensure that they've caught everything, and they well may have. Your job as a reviewer is to evaluate whether a piece works as is and is publication worthy. Don't assume the piece has problems, and don’t offer changes simply because you think you’re expected to find something wrong with it.

Last modified on Monday, 05 March 2018 12:22

18 comments

  • SamuelDoose

    posted by SamuelDoose

    Monday, 27 August 2018 04:03

    Wondering what REVIEW was all about,am glad for the information.It has really helped.I am new to writing as a whole and I need serious help.

  • SamuelDoose

    posted by SamuelDoose

    Monday, 27 August 2018 04:03

    Wondering what REVIEW was all about,am glad for the information.It has really helped.I am new to writing as a whole and I need serious help.

  • Ryan Merritt

    posted by Ryan Merritt

    Tuesday, 27 February 2018 11:40

    Howdy all, I am new to the site and hope to learn a lot here.

    I have very little formal writing education and wanted to join a site where I could learn to become a better writer through peer review. I have also recently come to realize that learning how to properly review others writing would most likely help improve my writing as well. I am, however, a complete newbie within the realm of critique and will go slowly at first. Fortunately, there are guidelines on site to help me take my first steps.

  • SamuelG

    posted by SamuelG

    Wednesday, 21 February 2018 23:34

    Thank you for posting a guidelines for newbies. I am a newbie at reviewing other people's writing,
    I tried to join a writers group here in my town, but they were all college students, who already had a certain level of writing and reviewing skill sets, and basically told me, we are not here to teach. So, I am looking forward to learning, and improving my skill set.
    I admit, I can use all the help that can be offered.
    Thank you for your time and patience!

    Sincerely,
    Samuel

  • SamuelG

    posted by SamuelG

    Wednesday, 21 February 2018 23:34

    Thank you for posting a guidelines for newbies. I am a newbie at reviewing other people's writing,
    I tried to join a writers group here in my town, but they were all college students, who already had a certain level of writing and reviewing skill sets, and basically told me, we are not here to teach. So, I am looking forward to learning, and improving my skill set.
    I admit, I can use all the help that can be offered.
    Thank you for your time and patience!

    Sincerely,
    Samuel

  • Paulie G.

    posted by Paulie G.

    Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:23

    I am a brand new member, having joined a whole ten minutes ago. I was especially glad to see guidelines on reviewing.
    Recently, an invitation came my way to joint the writers staff of a local newspaper. Having stated that they are always looking for new ideas for the paper, I immediately thought of a book review column.

    While I belong to a writers group in my neck of the woods, and we do critique other writer's work, I wanted to know the proper way to review books to be most effective.

    A life long reader, I feel this is the proper next step for me to pursue.

    So I thank you, and the friend who referred your website to me.

    Lorelei

  • Paulie G.

    posted by Paulie G.

    Wednesday, 21 February 2018 17:21

    I am a brand new member, having joined a whole ten minutes ago. I was especially glad to see guidelines on reviewing.
    Recently, an invitation came my way to joint the writers staff of a local newspaper. Having stated that they are always looking for new ideas for the paper, I immediately thought of a book review column.

    While I belong to a writers group in my neck of the woods, and we do critique other writer's work, I wanted to know the proper way to review books to be most effective.

    A life long reader, I feel this is the proper next step for me to pursue.

    So I thank you, and the friend who referred your website to me.

    Lorelei

  • Tom  Doyle

    posted by Tom Doyle

    Saturday, 17 February 2018 15:13

    Thank you for the guidelines. I have been writing for most of my long life and having very little formal education I have needed all the help I could get. Now, with your help, maybe I can give something back. Again, Thanks

  • Brenda Colbath

    posted by Brenda Colbath

    Wednesday, 08 November 2017 15:40

    This is helpful because, being a newbie, I think in the back of my mind, what make me think I have the right to criticize anyone else. I do remember how I felt when I asked someone to review my work and he sent it back so totally changed I didn't recognized it. I felt like he was telling me forget it, I am a much better writer than you. I only asked him to check how it flows and did it make sense. I spell check and use Grammarly several times. I promise to be honest and kind in reviewing anyone's work.

  • Sojourner McConnell

    posted by Sojourner McConnell

    Saturday, 18 March 2017 10:40

    The review instructions are clear. I will enjoy reading other writers work and reviewing them. I also will be glad to have my own work reviewed at a later date. I am new to the site and look forward to the interaction on here.

  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1  2 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
Login to post comments

To begin your journey to better writing, sign up today!

Print Version      Kindle Version

  

Help support SPW by accessing Amazon for all your purchases through our site.

US AMAZON.COM

UK AMAZON.CO.UK